This article provides an overview of evolving Australian records continuum theory and the records continuum model, which is interpreted as both a metaphor and a new worldview, representing a paradigm shift in Kuhn's sense. It is based on a distillation of research findings drawn from discourse, literary warrant and historical analysis, as well as case studies, participant observation and reflection. The article traces the emergence in Australia in the 1990s of a community of practice which has taken continuum rather than life cycle based perspectives, and adopted postcustodial approaches to recordkeeping and archiving. It "places" the evolution of records continuum theory and practice in Australia in the context of a larger international discourse that was reconceptualizing traditional theory, and "reinventing" records and archives practice.
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers
Publication Location
The Netherlands
Critical Arguements
CA Looks at the development of the Australian community of practice that led to records continuum theory: an approach that, in contrast to the North American life cycle approach, sees recordkeeping and archival practices as part of the same continuum of activities. Since the 1990s, there has been a lively debate between proponents of these two different ways of thinking. The second part of the article is highly theoretical, situating records continuum theory in the larger intellectual trend toward postmodernism and postpositivism.
Phrases
<P1> The model was built on a unifying concept of records inclusive of archives, which are defined as records of continuing value. It also drew on ideas about the "fixed" and "mutable" nature of records, the notion that records are ÔÇ£always in a process of becoming." (p. 334). <P2> Continuum ideas about the nature of records and archives challenge traditional understandings which differentiate "archives" from "records" on the basis of selection for permanent preservation in archival custody, and which focus on their fixed nature. Adopting a pluralist view of recorded information, continuum thinking characterises records as a special genre of documents in terms of their intent and functionality. It emphasises their evidentiary, transactional and contextual nature, rejecting approaches to the definition of records which focus on their subject content and informational value. (p. 335) <P3> [R]ecordkeeping and archiving processes ... help to assure the accessibility of meaningful records for as long as they are of value to people, organisations, and societies ÔÇô whether that be for a nanosecond or millennia. (p. 336) <P4> [I]f North American understandings of the term record keeping, based on life cycle concepts of records management, are used to interpret the writings of members of the Australian recordkeeping community, there is considerable potential for misunderstanding. <P5> Members of the recordkeeping and archiving community have worked together, often in partnership with members of other records and archives communities, on a range of national policy and standards initiatives, particularly in response to the challenge of electronic recordkeeping. These collaborative efforts resulted in AS 4390, the Australian Standard: Records Management (1996), the Australian Council of Archives' Common Framework for Electronic Recordkeeping (1996), and the Australian Records and Archives Competency Standards (1997). In a parallel and interconnected development, individual archival organisations have been developing electronic recordkeeping policies, standards, system design methodologies, and implementation strategies for their jurisdictions, including the National Archives of Australia's suite of standards, policies, and guidelines under the e-permanence initiative launched in early 2000. These developments have been deliberately set within the broader context of national standards and policy development frameworks. Two of the lead institutions in these initiatives are the National Archives of Australia and the State Records Authority of New South Wales, which have based their work in this area on exploration of fundamental questions about the nature of records and archives, and the role of recordkeeping and archiving in society. <warrant> (p. 339) <P6> In adopting a continuum-based worldview and defining its "place" in the world, the Australian recordkeeping and archiving community consciously rejected the life cycle worldview that had dominated records management and archives practice in the latter half of the 20th century in North America. ... They were also strong advocates of the nexus between accountable recordkeeping and accountability in a democratic society, and supporters of the dual role of an archival authority as both a regulator of current recordkeeping, and preserver of the collective memory of the state/nation. (p. 343-344) <P7> [P]ost-modern ideas about records view them as dynamic objects that are fixed in terms of content and meaningful elements of their structure, but linked to ever-broadening layers of contextual metadata that manages their meanings, and enables their accessibility and useability as they move through "spacetime." (p. 349) <P8> In exploring the role of recordkeeping and archiving professionals within a postcustodial frame of reference, archival theorists such as Brothman, Brown, Cook, Harris, Hedstrom, Hurley, Nesmith, and Upward have concluded that they are an integral part of the record and archive making and keeping process, involved in society's remembering and forgetting. (p. 355) <P9> Writings on the societal context of functional appraisal have gone some way to translate into appraisal policies and strategies the implications of the shifts in perception away from seeing records managers as passive keepers of documentary detritus ... and archivists as Jenkinson's neutral, impartial custodians of inherited records. (p. 355-356)
Conclusions
RQ "By attempting to define, to categorise, pin down, and represent records and their contexts of creation, management, and use, descriptive standards and metadata schema can only ever represent a partial view of the dynamic, complex, and multi-dimensional nature of records, and their rich webs of contextual and documentary relationships. Within these limitations, what recordkeeping metadata research is reaching towards are ways to represent records and their contexts as richly and extensively as possible, to develop frameworks that recognise their mutable and contingent nature, as well as the role of recordkeeping and archiving professionals (records managers and archivists) in their creation and evolution, and to attempt to address issues relating to time and space." (p. 354)
Type
Journal
Title
Accessing essential evidence on the web: Towards an Australian recordkeeping metadata standard
CA Standardized recordkeeping metadata allows for access to essential evidence of business activities and promotes reliability and authenticity. The Australian records and metadata community have been working hard to define standards and identify requirements as well as support interoperability.
Phrases
<P1> But records, as accountability traces and evidence of business activity, have additional metadata requirements. Authoritative, well-structured metadata which specifies their content, structure, context, and essential management needs must be embedded in, wrapped around and otherwise persistently linked to them from the moment they are created if they are to continue to function as evidence. (p.2) <P2> People do business in social and organizational contexts that are governed by external mandates (e.g. social mores, laws) and internal mandates (e.g. policies, business rules). Mandates establish who is responsible for what, and govern social and organizational activity, including the creation of full and accurate records. <warrant> (p.3)
Type
Journal
Title
Describing Records in Context in the Continuum: The Australian Recordkeeping Metadata Schema
CA RKMS is based on traditional recordkeeping thinking. However, it also looks to the future by viewing records as active agents of change, as intelligent information objects, which are supported by the metadata that RKMS' framework provides. Through RKMS, the dynamic world of business can be linked to the more passive world of cyberspace resource management.
Phrases
<P1> As long as records remain in the local domains in which they are created, a lot of broader contextual metadata is "in the air," carried in the minds of the corporate users of the records. When records move beyond the boundaries of the local domain in which they are created or, as is increasingly the case in networked environments, they are created in the first place in a global rather than a local domain, then this kind of metadata needs to be made explicit -- that is, captured and persistently linked to the record. This is essential so that users in the broader domain can uniquely identify, retrieve and understand the meanings of records. (p.7) <P2> The broader social context of the project is the need for individuals, society, government, and commerce to continually access the information they need to conduct their business, protect their rights and entitlements, and securely trace the trail of responsibility and action in distributed enterprises. ... Maintaining reliable, authentic and useable evidence of transactions through time and space has significant business, social, and cultural implications, as records provide essential evidence for purposes of governance, accountability, memory and identity. (p.6)
Conclusions
RQ There is a need to develop typologies of recordkeeping relationships such as agent to record and better ways to express them through metadata.
Type
Journal
Title
Towards Frameworks for Standardising Recordkeeping Metadata
CA There are many challenges to devising metadata schema to manage records over time. Continuum thinking provides a conceptual framework to identify these problems.
Phrases
<P1> It is clear from the SPIRT Project definition that recordkeeping and archival control systems have always been about capturing and managing recordkeeping metadata. (p.30) <P2> One of the keys to understanding the Project's approach to what metadata needs to be captured, persistently linked to documentation of social and business activity, and managed through space and time, lies in the continuum view of records. In continuum thinking, [records] are seen not as 'passive objects to described retrospectively,' but as agents of action, 'active participants in business processes and technologies.'" (p.37)
Type
Web Page
Title
Documenting Business: The Australian Recordkeeping Metadata Schema
In July 1999, the Australian Recordkeeping Metadata Schema (RKMS) was approved by its academic and industry steering group. This metadata set now joins other community specific sets in being available for use and implementation into workplace applications. The RKMS has inherited elements from and built on many other metadata standards associated with information management. It has also contributed to the development of subsequent sector specific recordkeeping metadata sets. The importance of the RKMS as a framework for 'mapping' or reading other sets and also as a standardised set of metadata available for adoption in diverse implementation environments is now emerging. This paper explores the context of the SPIRT Recordkeeping Metadata Project, and the conceptual models developed by the SPIRT Research Team as a framework for standardising and defining Recordkeeping Metadata. It then introduces the elements of the SPIRT Recordkeeping Metadata Schema and explores its functionality before discussing implementation issues with reference to document management and workflow technologies.
Critical Arguements
CA Much of the metadata work done so far has worked off the passive assumption of records as document-like objects. Instead, they need to be seen as active entities in business transactions.
Conclusions
RQ In order to decide which elements are to be used from the RKMS, organizations need to delineate the reach of specific implementations as far as how and when records need to be bound with metadata.
This paper discusses how metadata standards can help organizations comply with the ISO 9000 standards for quality systems. It provides a brief overview of metadata, ISO 9000 and related records management standards. It then analyses in some depth the ISO 9000 requirements for quality records, and outlines the problems that some organizations have in complying with them. It also describes the metadata specifications developed by the University of Pittsburgh Electronic Recordkeeping project and the SPIRT Recordkeeping Metadata project in Australia and discusses the role of metadata in meeting ISO 9000 requirements for the creation and preservation of reliable, authentic and accessible records.
Publisher
Records Continuum Research Group
Critical Arguements
CA "During the last few years a number of research projects have studied the types of metadata needed to create, manage and make accessible quality records, i.e. reliable, authentic and useable records. This paper will briefly discuss the purposes of recordkeeping metadata, with reference to emerging records management standards, and the models presented by two projects, one in the United States and one in Australia. It will also briefly review the ISO 9000 requirements for records and illustrate how metadata can help an organization meet these requirements."
Conclusions
RQ "Quality records provide many advantages for organizations and can help companies meet the ISO 9000 certification. However, systems must be designed to create the appropriate metadata to ensure they comply with recordkeeping requirements, particularly those identified by records management standards like AS 4390 and the proposed international standard, which provide benchmarks for recordkeeping best practice. The Pittsburgh metadata model and the SPIRT framework provide organizations with standardized sets of metadata that would ensure the creation, preservation and accessibility of reliable, authentic and meaningful records for as long as they are of use. In deciding what metadata to capture, organisations should consider the cost of meeting the requirements of the ISO 9000 guidelines and any related records management best practice standards, and the possible risk of not meeting these requirements."
CA The role of archives and archivists is being fundamentally redefined in consideration of postcustodial theories and practice.
Conclusions
RQ Who is accountable? How explicit should the "imprint" of the archivist be in the shaping of the record? Who decides (and how) what we remember and what we keep?
CA There is great potential in developing a national standard for the control of records that combines traditional recordkeeping practices with continuum-based thinking and cutting-edge metadata.
Conclusions
RQ One challenge is integrating item-level metadata with system-level metadata. Linking old and new archival descriptive systems should be done as seamlessly as possible, since retrofitting would be too expensive. Another important area is linking contextual metadata to records whenever they are used outside their domain in order to provide "external validation" (p.17) <warrant>
