When: October 15-20, 2001
Where: Ufficio Centrale per i Beni Archivistici,
Rome, Italy
Attendees: Barbara Craig, Luciana Duranti, Terry Eastwood,
Philip Eppard, Sharon Farb, Gigliola Fioravanti, Normand Fortier, Tahra
Fung (Project Co-ordinator),Anne Gilliland-Swetland, Kevin Glick
(Project Co-ordinator, U.S. InterPARES Team), Maria Guercio, Yvette
Hackett, Hans Hofman, Peter Horsman, Livia Iacovino, Agnes Jonker, Brent
Lee, University of British Columbia, Rich Lysakowski, Heather MacNeil,
Jean-Pascal Morghese (Technical Co-ordinator), Christine Petillat,
Seamus Ross, Bill Underwood, Bruce Walton
Workshop Objectives:
- Preservation Task Force will discuss case study walk-through.
- Strategies Task Force will refine the draft of the intellectual
framework guiding the development of policies, strategies, procedures,
and standards, as distilled from the recommendations of the other
three task forces.
- Discuss and vote on final reports of each of the task forces.
- Discuss national team reports.
- Discuss dissemination of reports and other findings.
Summary:
Workshop #9 was the final, official workshop of the InterPARES
Project. The Preservation Task Force met in order to continue the case
study walk-through case study exercise that was begun in August. The
task proved to be difficult without the use of a data model and because
of a lack of adequate detail in the case study material. However, the
attempt at a walk-through identified, among other things, the need for a
generic preservation strategy, or framework. The Strategies Task Force
meeting consisted of the discussion of the other task force reports,
their distillation, and the creation of a draft report. This report was
presented to the other task force members and the International Team
members for comments. Over the course of the remaining days, the
International Team and member of the task forces 1) voted on the reports
of the Authenticity, Appraisal, and Preservation Task Forces, 2)
reviewed and commented on the work of the Strategies Task Force, 3)
produced a common outline for national and multinational team reports 4)
divided into their respective national and multinational teams in order
to discuss and work on their reports, 5) discussed the dissemination of
the findings of the project.
|
|
|